Slant by Noah

Slant by Noah
"Hmm… I don't see any slant."

Saturday, August 29, 2009

Sinema Distorts the Truth — Or At Least the English Language

Arizona legislator Kyrsten Sinema, from Phoenix's 15th district, made an astonishing claim Thursday at a rally ostensibly promoting "health insurance reform."
"Now you all have seen what's been happening in the past couple weeks, right? Now I gotta tell you, a lot of that is overblown, this idea of people hootin' and hollerin' at these rallies and stuff. That, a lot of that is just made up.... Now I gotta tell ya, though, those folks are not everywhere. We've held seven town halls at the White House Health Reform Task Force here in Arizona, not a single disruption. So the fact is that most American's want health reform and they want it now.
"Let me tell you what I need from all of you. I need your voices. Because right now the folks who are getting their faces on TV and their names in the media are the few who are making up stories, distorting the truth, and trying to scare Americans away from what everybody wants, which is health reform."
Sinema's use of hyperbole is intended to serve two purposes. First, to reinforce her supporters' hopes that the unanimous cheers of support at the rally echo unanimous support for their cause from coast to coast and second, to marginalize any detractors, even though she believes them to be "just made up." She also seems to think that these made-up naysayers are trying to scare Americans.

"What is truly scary, what is truly risky, is to do nothing," That was President Obama earlier this month. How's that for the pots calling the kettle a fear monger?

Just a moment of critical thought will reveal that everybody wants "health reform" just as everybody wanted Obama for president. That is to say, not everybody does. Probably Sinema is using the condescending, liberal "everybody" that only includes people as enlightened as herself and not the people who disagree with her — those whom activist comedian and erstwhile radio personality Janeane Garofalo recently called functionally retarded.

Sinema's statement wasn't just an exaggeration, but the opposite of truth. But then, we can play that game, too. If it is false to say that everybody wants health reform, then, while not strictly true, it is more accurate to say that everybody doesn't.

Wednesday, August 26, 2009


The "Lion of the Senate", Edward Moore Kennedy last night was reunited with his brothers, Jack and Bobby. And for the first time in forty years, he will perhaps face Mary Jo Kopechne.

Saturday, April 25, 2009

You Deserve a Pat on the Back

When was the last time an environmentalist congratulated you for your efforts or thanked you for three decades of tremendous improvements in air quality? Hmm, never? Has a deluge of negative environmental news and "green marketing" convinced you that mankind is driving the planet irretrievably toward the brink of doom? If you live in Arizona, you might be really terrified by the state's new web site, (We're running out?!? Where does it all go?)

Well, the truth may not be nearly as bad as some fear mongers would have you believe. Here is a comparison of growth measures and emissions from the EPA's latest report on air quality. Click the image to enlarge it.

Nice job! While you continued to drive your car, use electricity, and grow your family and the economy, air quality improved dramatically. Surprised?

This and other good news that you won't hear from NPR, CNN, or any member of a teachers union, is the reason that I look forward each year to the upbeat and provocative analysis in the Pacific Research Institute's Index of Leading Environmental Indicators.

If you rely solely on liberal sources, you're missing a lot of the truth.

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Earth Stand Still Day 2009

Happy Earth Day everybody! I wish I could say that without so much sarcasm welling up inside.

I just watched the 2008 version of The Day the Earth Stood Still, starring Keanu Reeves and Jennifer Connelly, in which stunning visual effects were welded onto Hollywood-style commercialism, calling to mind movies like Minority Report or Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life. It’s momentarily entertaining but less than inspiring.

Be warned: my following comments contain spoilers. I won’t ruin the ending for you, but I’ll spill parts of the plot that the director withholds until the midpoint.

I involuntarily snickered when it was revealed that an object hurtling through space would impact Manhattan. Why are movie makers and story tellers so obsessed with New York. It seems that no apocalyptic story can possibly be portrayed without asking, “How will this affect our beloved Gotham?!?”

I guffawed a little later when the object didn’t crash, but gently landed in the middle of Central Park. Here’s a tip for you screen writers and directors in your elitist NY and LA bubbles, from one of us in Flyover Country: your universally beloved, globally recognized landmark is a worn out cliché.

I laughed out loud when the alien being, Klaatu, portrayed robotically by Reeves, stated his intention to address the United Nations. The Secretary of Defense tried to debrief the alien, who asked, “Do you speak for the entire human race?” Are you seeing a theme here? Where else would a superior alien address the world, if not in our Earth’s gleaming capital city, the seat of industry and power and government in the new world order. And of course the UN speaks for the human race!

In both versions of this movie, Klaatu is intended as a metaphorical type of Jesus Christ. He descends from the heavens to save the world. In the 1951 version, he takes the name Carpenter. He is tender and sympathetic to Helen and Robbie Benson, as Jesus was to widows and children. Klaatu has come to judge and cleanse the world. But in this new version, he is only concerned with humanity’s crimes against the environment. And his pronouncement is the most revealing moment in the entire story: he has decided that the earth is far too valuable a resource and the human inhabitants would be a small sacrifice to save this glittering blue gem. This brings me to my point — and to the end of any spoilers.
And the Lord God spake unto Moses, saying: The heavens, they are many, and they cannot be numbered unto man; but they are numbered unto me, for they are mine. And as one earth shall pass away, and the heavens thereof even so shall another come; and there is no end to my works, neither to my words. For behold, this is my work and my glory — to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man. (Moses 1:39)
God’s children are His crowning creation, made in His likeness and image. Doubt not that He created a perfect earth and filled it with everything necessary to carry out their probation.
For the earth is full, and there is enough and to spare; yea, I prepared all things, and have given unto the children of men to be agents unto themselves. (D&C 104:17)
He gave Adam “dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.” (Genesis 1:26) As Thomas S. Monson wrote in the April 1990 Ensign, “Earth [is]a proving ground, a testing station, a provider of needed experience. We laugh, we cry, we work, we play, we love, we live. And then we die. And dead we would remain but for one man and his mission, even Jesus of Nazareth.”

These verses shine a clear light on the backward message of those who value the environment or animals over human life. Even the basest, cruelest man on earth is a child of God and has a place in His plan. It’s easy to lose this perspective. We live in the times Isaiah foresaw when morality would be turned on its head, prompting him to write, “Wo unto them that call evil good, and good evil, that put darkness for light, and light for darkness, that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!”

Beware the subtle temptation to think of the modern environmentalist movement as purely secular. We must closely scrutinize any fashion or movement which invites its followers to devalue human life. As a side note, consider the close ties between modern environmentalism and the resurgent Zero Population movement. The Times Online recently reported that Jonathon Porritt, a leading green advisor to Prime Minister Gordon Brown, speaking for something called the Optimum Population Trust when he recommended that Great Britain must reduce its population by at least half if it is to build a sustainable society. “Population growth, plus economic growth, is putting the world under terrible pressure. Each person in Britain has far more impact on the environment than those in developing countries so cutting our population is one way to reduce that impact.”

May I suggest a philosophy that is more caring of the earth and less wobbly than the global warming crowd? The Boy Scouts of America, embraced for the last 96 years by the LDS Church as a means to provide training and worthwhile leisure time to young men, teaches the Outdoor Code to its ranks.
As an American, I will do my best to
Be clean in my outdoor manners,
Be careful with fire,
Be considerate in the outdoors, and
Be conservation-minded.
The Outdoor Code is individually and inwardly focused. “I will do my best….” Contrast this with environmentalists seeking to control others and limit freedom through litigation and legislation, trying to force their own moral code onto the rest of the world. I for one, will forever be a dedicated conservationist and stay true to the simple principles I learned as a scout and shun the dogma of the modern environmentalist movement.

Saturday, March 7, 2009

'Equal Rights' (Translation: Unfair Advantage)

The California Supreme Court heard arguments Thursday in a case that questions the constitutional muster of the state’s newest ban on gay marriage. The Associated Press mentions one constitutionally conniving (or conceivably confused) counselor:
"Minutes into Thursday's proceedings, the justices peppered a lawyer representing unwed same-sex couples with tough questions on why Proposition 8 represents a denial of fundamental rights when same-sex couples still have the legal benefits of marriage through domestic partnerships.
"'Is it your argument in this proceeding that the passage of Proposition 8 also took away, in addition to the label of marriage, the core of substantive rights of marriage this court outlined in its decision last year?' [Associate Justices Joyce] Kennard asked.
"'One of the core constitutional rights is to be treated with equality, dignity and respect,' replied Shannon Minter, legal director of the National Center for Lesbian Rights."
Rubbish. Minter’s evasive reply is either to be revered for its concentration of misdirection and manipulation or it must be scorned for its bald ignorance. Given his distinguished career as an attorney and author, it’s difficult to believe the latter. Either way, his statement seems a purely emotional argument.
It’s a well founded truism that respect must be earned. Dignity derives from the Latin dignitās — worthiness. I grant you that the very humanity of a person, his position as a child of God, endows him with a certain amount of dignity and with the responsibility to treat others in a spirit of brotherhood. The UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights affirms that “all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.” But from there, does no accomplishment garner additional dignity? Is there no transgression which diminishes a man’s worthiness?
All men are created equal. But no man has a natural right to any persistent, lifelong equalization without regard to his choices and actions. I submit to you that this is the central, most common misunderstanding today regarding “equality, dignity and respect”. Advocacy groups arguing for special privileges or protection have long framed their demands within the term equality.
I’ll wager that Mr. Minter has never read Dr. Seuss’ King Looie Katz. For a common sense sociology lesson on equality and fairness, I highly recommend it. It’s a story of a fancy cat named Looie, who was the King of Katzen-stein. A proud cat, King Looie ordered his subject, Fooie Katz, to follow him everywhere, holding the royal tail to prevent it from dragging. It wasn’t long before Fooie determined that because of his high station, he too deserved that someone else should carry his tail; enter Kooie Katz. When Kooie’s pride was hurt, he got Chooie Katz to carry his tail.
"And so it went in Katzen-stein.Chooie Katz, Kooie Katz
Next, Chooie Katz got Hooie.
And Hooie Katz got Blooie Katz.
And Blooie Katz got Prooie…
"… Till all the cats in Katzen-stein
Were hiking round and round,
All keeping one another’s tails
From dragging on the ground.
"All proud!
Except for one small cat…
… The last cat in the line."
When the last cat, Zooie, could find no one to hold his tail, he revolted and the rest of Katzen-stein followed suit. After that, the King and all the citizens were “more grown-up”, “more demo-catic”.
The moral of King Looie Katz is a lesson in stratification; that demanding one’s fair share in the name of equality will inevitably result in the exploitation of another. And herein lies the hypocrisy of most cries for equality: what is wanted is not equal treatment, but an unfair advantage.
Here’s a rule of thumb that will help you sort out such concocted rights as equality: Whatever so-called right that impinges upon the freedom of another person is not a right at all. In English, we usually call it a privilege. But the noble struggle for equality has always won more support than demands for privilege.